There ain't no "vs".

End of.

KILLdozer wrote:There ain't no "vs".

End of.

There was literally a RAW vs Smackdown PPV like 5 months ago. When you have two different creative teams, they'll always be some sort of vs

cero2k wrote:

KILLdozer wrote:There ain't no "vs".

End of.

There was literally a RAW vs Smackdown PPV like 5 months ago. When you have two different creative teams, they'll always be some sort of vs

I'm​ not even gonna attempt to quote all those things BRM said about it, but nothing that happens on one show ever matters on the other, they basically act like the two shows just exist within their own universes. They didn't even tell me who the Royal rumble on RAW Because it was a SD guy. Again-like nothing even happened.

KILLdozer wrote:

cero2k wrote:

KILLdozer wrote:There ain't no "vs".

End of.

There was literally a RAW vs Smackdown PPV like 5 months ago. When you have two different creative teams, they'll always be some sort of vs

I'm​ not even gonna attempt to quote all those things BRM said about it, but nothing that happens on one show ever matters on the other, they basically act like the two shows just exist within their own universes. They didn't even tell me who the Royal rumble on RAW Because it was a SD guy. Again-like nothing even happened.

as it kinda should, we'd hate the rivalry if they brought it up over and over and over, but every time that Shane/Steph/Foley/Dragon mention ratings, I can only assume that it's about being the better show against the other

e-moose wrote:I only called my 2 cents "SmackDown vs. Raw" becauze I was giving my personal opinion comparing the quality of the 2 brandz. I had no intention of suggesting that they should have anything to do with one another.

Raw iz so bad now with all its teamz of 2 challenging single competitors to handicap matchez, interference, crappy booking, unbelievable finishez where a single seemingly ineffective move rezults in a 3-count, etc.

I feel like Charlotte iz a prizoner, the shining star of Raw, way too good of a wrestler to be subjected to all the bullshit of the Raw brand. If thingz were just, and made to be believable, she should be consistently carrying a championship.

I agree with most of this. It often feels like the best and worst of WWE has been separated out into two shows, with Raw getting 99% of the "worst" stuff.

Big Red Machine wrote:

e-moose wrote:I only called my 2 cents "SmackDown vs. Raw" becauze I was giving my personal opinion comparing the quality of the 2 brandz. I had no intention of suggesting that they should have anything to do with one another.

Raw iz so bad now with all its teamz of 2 challenging single competitors to handicap matchez, interference, crappy booking, unbelievable finishez where a single seemingly ineffective move rezults in a 3-count, etc.

I feel like Charlotte iz a prizoner, the shining star of Raw, way too good of a wrestler to be subjected to all the bullshit of the Raw brand. If thingz were just, and made to be believable, she should be consistently carrying a championship.

I agree with most of this. It often feels like the best and worst of WWE has been separated out into two shows, with Raw getting 99% of the "worst" stuff.

Since I know how much you love the Randy Orton burning his house down lol.

KILLdozer wrote:

Big Red Machine wrote:

e-moose wrote:I only called my 2 cents "SmackDown vs. Raw" becauze I was giving my personal opinion comparing the quality of the 2 brandz. I had no intention of suggesting that they should have anything to do with one another.

Raw iz so bad now with all its teamz of 2 challenging single competitors to handicap matchez, interference, crappy booking, unbelievable finishez where a single seemingly ineffective move rezults in a 3-count, etc.

I feel like Charlotte iz a prizoner, the shining star of Raw, way too good of a wrestler to be subjected to all the bullshit of the Raw brand. If thingz were just, and made to be believable, she should be consistently carrying a championship.

I agree with most of this. It often feels like the best and worst of WWE has been separated out into two shows, with Raw getting 99% of the "worst" stuff.

Since I know how much you love the Randy Orton burning his house down lol.

That and the Nikki Bella promos (and the Ambrose-Ellsworth stuff) are the other 1%.

Not to mention 99 % of the stuff JBL usually says.

KILLdozer wrote:Not to mention 99 % of the stuff JBL usually says.

whats the 99% of 1%? Someone get me Scott Steiner!

cero2k wrote:

KILLdozer wrote:Not to mention 99 % of the stuff JBL usually says.

whats the 99% of 1%? Someone get me Scott Steiner!

As requested:

Z's instead of S's really bother me.

Itz not good for buzinezz

XIV wrote:Z's instead of S's really bother me.

Itz not good for buzinezz

Not a fan of the Hardy Boyz or Dudley Boyz?