http://www.thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/
http://www.thewrestlingrevolution.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=21094
But that's because that's what WWE's usual M.O. is in these situations, and confirming it makes no sense for them, as all it does is lose them a valuable star for the remaining three months of his contract. Why confirm it and make all of his matches feel like lame duck situations when you could use him for one last feud or two to try to get someone new (like, say, EC III) over to a level to be able to replace Dean on the card?
Chances are that he won't be used at all, maybe Nia did write him off last nightBig Red Machine wrote: ↑Jan 29th, '19, 19:42But that's because that's what WWE's usual M.O. is in these situations, and confirming it makes no sense for them, as all it does is lose them a valuable star for the remaining three months of his contract. Why confirm it and make all of his matches feel like lame duck situations when you could use him for one last feud or two to try to get someone new (like, say, EC III) over to a level to be able to replace Dean on the card?
Which is still a waste because by not commenting or denying it you could have at least kept people guessing while having him put someone over in one final program.cero2k wrote: ↑Jan 29th, '19, 22:18Chances are that he won't be used at all, maybe Nia did write him off last nightBig Red Machine wrote: ↑Jan 29th, '19, 19:42But that's because that's what WWE's usual M.O. is in these situations, and confirming it makes no sense for them, as all it does is lose them a valuable star for the remaining three months of his contract. Why confirm it and make all of his matches feel like lame duck situations when you could use him for one last feud or two to try to get someone new (like, say, EC III) over to a level to be able to replace Dean on the card?