Page 12 of 52
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 16th, '11, 13:28
by VadeKruger
Vance Valentine has arrived!! Thanks to Mr. Everlast for the great debut match!!!
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 16th, '11, 17:05
by kirbs2002
VadeKruger wrote:kirbs2002 wrote:Everlast you little pr*ck! How dare you! X(
Whats he done?
What do you mean "What's he done?" He broke the 4th wall!
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 17th, '11, 00:16
by VadeKruger
I may be acting like a total wally brain here...........but whats the 4th wall?!
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 17th, '11, 00:25
by kirbs2002
From answers.com:
Fourth wall n.
The space separating the audience from the action of a theatrical performance, traditionally conceived of as an imaginary wall completing the enclosure of the stage.
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 17th, '11, 04:11
by Chris Everlast
U mad, Kirby?
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 17th, '11, 10:28
by VadeKruger
Sure looks that way..............
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 18th, '11, 08:23
by KILLdozer
nice how anderson left out nntk when mentioning world champions :p
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 18th, '11, 08:30
by Lynas
KILLdozer wrote:nice how anderson left out nntk when mentioning world champions :p
If you remember correctly, you'll know that NNTK didn't really do much cleanly... he was talking about clean win champions.
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 18th, '11, 08:31
by KILLdozer
BUT,,,he won the belt cleanly,it was straightforward win,,despite intereference from shane lynas,,oh i remember :p
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 18th, '11, 09:03
by Chris Everlast
Since when did anything Prophecy-related deserve being called 'clean'?
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 18th, '11, 09:05
by KILLdozer
lol it was before prophecy
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 18th, '11, 09:16
by Chris Everlast
NNTK is in prophecy, thus Prophecy-related. :p
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 18th, '11, 09:39
by KILLdozer
sorry but the rule already was that the challenger picks the stipulation :p
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 18th, '11, 09:45
by Lynas
KILLdozer wrote:sorry but the rule already was that the challenger picks the stipulation :p
I'm afraid it wasn't.
The rules from the rulemaker (Vade) stated that the Champion chose the stipulation.
I've had many discussion about this rule & have brought in OFFICIAL change.
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 18th, '11, 09:55
by KILLdozer
well yes remember the standard match for it between nntk and everlast from two shows before meltdown? it was a standard match cuz everlast said so,,vade told me that challengers pick the stipulation
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 18th, '11, 10:06
by Lynas
KILLdozer wrote:well yes remember the standard match for it between nntk and everlast from two shows before meltdown? it was a standard match cuz everlast said so,,vade told me that challengers pick the stipulation
Wel it was originally Champion... it's never been clarified enough & now... now it's clarified.
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 19th, '11, 22:08
by KILLdozer
I just wanna go on record and say the whole invasion angle and bcw/prophecy takeover was all brilliantly done,,very excellent,hell the berg even got his ass kicked twice :ymapplause:
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 20th, '11, 07:47
by Darkil
KILLdozer wrote:I just wanna go on record and say the whole invasion angle and bcw/prophecy takeover was all brilliantly done,,very excellent,hell the berg even got his a** kicked twice :ymapplause:
Dude, you're gushing..
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 20th, '11, 08:35
by KILLdozer
naw man more like patting myself on the back lol you missed it darkil the whole angle was just wrappin up when you got started
Re: General Non Kayfabe Discussion
Posted: Jan 20th, '11, 11:56
by VadeKruger
No matter...................Im sure Sinister will fit in very nicely in WAC.