Renee Paquette's WWE non-compete clause still not up, talks AEW

Everything that is happening in the wrestling world.
Post Reply
User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Renee Paquette's WWE non-compete clause still not up, talks AEW

Post by cero2k » Aug 6th, '21, 12:00

RENEE PAQUETTE'S WWE NON-COMPETE CLAUSE STILL NOT UP, TALKS AEW
soruce: https://www.f4wonline.com/wwe-news/rene ... revolution

Despite leaving the company nearly a year ago, Renee Paquette said her WWE non-compete clause has still not expired but is close to being up.

In an interview with Wrestling Inc., Paquette revealed her status, adding that she still has a good relationship with WWE and there's no bad blood with the company.

Dave Meltzer noted in this week's Wrestling Observer Newsletter that Paquette had an employee contract where she could leave with two weeks notice. However, because she left on her own, she couldn't work for a competitor for a full year and that unlike the 90-day non-compete clauses where talents are paid during that time, she wasn't paid for the year.

As far as what's next, Paquette said she doesn't want to separate herself from pro wrestling because she loves it and knows that's where her fanbase comes from. However, she would like to bridge the gap between that and whatever other projects she works on.

She and husband Jon Moxley have always both done their own thing, but in looking at AEW, there are "endless opportunities of other things I could be doing over there if that was to be something that came up down the line," adding that she hasn't put much thought into it.

"That’s interesting to be like, 'Oh, wait! I can do wrestling things again!’ That’s just been off the table for me for so long," she said.

Paquette would like to bring her Oral Sessions podcast to TV and mentioned how she loved what David Letterman did with his recent show for Netflix as well as Chelsea Handler's former talk show. She hopes to create her own shows instead of being plugged into something that already exists if possible.
Image

User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Re: Renee Paquette's WWE non-compete clause still not up, talks AEW

Post by cero2k » Aug 6th, '21, 12:01

But i thought WWE's competition was 'sleep' and not promotions like AEW
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: Renee Paquette's WWE non-compete clause still not up, talks AEW

Post by Big Red Machine » Aug 6th, '21, 15:47

cero2k wrote: Aug 6th, '21, 12:01 But i thought WWE's competition was 'sleep' and not promotions like AEW
It is. WWE hates sleep. That's why they book their product to be so frustrating as to cause me to lose it.
Actually, now that I think about it, Vince, Tony Khan and Delirious are all on the same side in that fight. A SECRET ALLIANCE! They're all in cahoots! I've figured it out!


On an unrelated note, does anyone know if seeing patterns that aren't there is a side-effect of lack of sleep?
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests