WOTW: Gimmick Match

All Time Greatest, Worst, Sickest, Weirdest, Funniest...you get the idea.
User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jan 17th, '11, 17:59

Which gimmick matches can you just not stand?
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Big Red Machine » Jan 17th, '11, 18:13

First Blood matches. They make NO SENSE! A regular match doesn't stop when someone is bleeding! So what is the point of this?
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

User avatar
kirbs2002
Posts: 967
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 17:04

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by kirbs2002 » Jan 17th, '11, 19:09

*Anything* on a pole match. I have yet to see a good *such and such* on a pole match.
Reality TV is faker than "fake" wrestling!

"The views that I'm about to express are not necessarily those of anyone else but myself, but they ought to be and, in fact, they probably are"

User avatar
Earth Child
Posts: 874
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 21:44

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Earth Child » Jan 17th, '11, 19:10

Punjabi prison match.

Dog kennel from hell match

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jan 17th, '11, 19:44

Earth Child wrote:Punjabi prison match.
I thought the concept wasn't that bad.
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Big Red Machine » Jan 17th, '11, 19:52

yourcrapsweak wrote:
Earth Child wrote:Punjabi prison match.
I thought the concept wasn't that bad.
Same here. I guess the problem was that it looked lame.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

badnewzxl
Posts: 2918
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:53

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by badnewzxl » Jan 17th, '11, 20:36

kirbs2002 wrote:*Anything* on a pole match. I have yet to see a good *such and such* on a pole match.
this. Not just bc the match itself sucked, but bc EVERY one of these matches has been lame except MAYBE one (Sting v. Jake)
Image

User avatar
Rabid619
Posts: 6093
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 14:02

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Rabid619 » Jan 17th, '11, 21:17

"Anything" on a Pole matches are stupid. I personally havent liked them either.
Image

User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by cero2k » Jan 18th, '11, 14:14

tuxedo matches, and that match that Hogan and Macho man had were they needed to get in a cage, fight the world, hit people with a frying pan, then escape again, i don't recall what it was called...

BTW, the "thing" on a pole match depends on what's in the pole. Viagra on a pole, rat in a pole, stuff like that is pretty stupid. But Contract in a pole (see rock vs manking) is a fairly interesting way of doing a career vs career, or No1 contenders match.
Image

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Jan 18th, '11, 16:09

cero2k wrote:tuxedo matches, and that match that Hogan and Macho man had were they needed to get in a cage, fight the world, hit people with a frying pan, then escape again, i don't recall what it was called...
The Tower of Doom! Worst idea ever. What the fuck were they thinking?
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

badnewzxl
Posts: 2918
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:53

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by badnewzxl » Jan 19th, '11, 03:44

Tower of Doom is pretty lame.
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
[youtube][/youtube]
Image

User avatar
Lynas
Future Endeavored
Posts: 731
Joined: Dec 17th, '10, 11:20

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Lynas » Jan 19th, '11, 04:14

MY GOD!


BadNewz don't videolink us this shit!That was awful... oh and not forgetting that before escaping Macho Man forgot to pin someone so had to run back and pin, though, quite why a pin in a fucked up cage match was necessary, I forget now...




I also thought WCW World War 3 was an awful concept.

badnewzxl
Posts: 2918
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:53

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by badnewzxl » Jan 19th, '11, 04:24

Lynas wrote:MY GOD!


BadNewz don't videolink us this s**t!That was awful... oh and not forgetting that before escaping Macho Man forgot to pin someone so had to run back and pin, though, quite why a pin in a F'ed up cage match was necessary, I forget now..
=)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =)) =))
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Big Red Machine » Jan 19th, '11, 10:32

While we're talking about Cage matches, I have always hated the "escape" stip, especially if the match is Escape Only. The point of the cage is to either
1) Keep the wrestlers in the ring (i.e. stop the heel from running away)
or
2) Keep others out (i.e. stop interference)

This is done to ensure a good, clean finish in which ONE MAN BEATS THE OTHER IN THE MIDDLE OF THE RING (again, the reason for the match in the first place was because someone didn't want this to happen). So why the hell would you have a stip where you can win the match by doing the EXACT THING THE STIP IS DESIGNED TO AVOID? It makes no sense.

Also, what satisfaction is there for the babyface when he wins a match by RUNNING AWAY from the heels? That's not a very babyface thing to do.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

badnewzxl
Posts: 2918
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:53

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by badnewzxl » Jan 19th, '11, 19:20

Big Red Machine wrote:While we're talking about Cage matches, I have always hated the "escape" stip, especially if the match is Escape Only. The point of the cage is to either
1) Keep the wrestlers in the ring (i.e. stop the heel from running away)
or
2) Keep others out (i.e. stop interference)

This is done to ensure a good, clean finish in which ONE MAN BEATS THE OTHER IN THE MIDDLE OF THE RING (again, the reason for the match in the first place was because someone didn't want this to happen). So why the hell would you have a stip where you can win the match by doing the EXACT THING THE STIP IS DESIGNED TO AVOID? It makes no sense.

Also, what satisfaction is there for the babyface when he wins a match by RUNNING AWAY from the heels? That's not a very babyface thing to do.
I don't think cage matches are made primarily for those two reasons, but I don't like the escape option that much either. I always thought ppl were put in cage matches bc they REALLY wanted to hurt one another, and cage matches are the"most dangerous matches in pro wrestling." I don't mind escapes all the time, but I HATE it when someone escapes through the door; that's just stupid. I think cage matches should def have locked doors and, most of the time, a top for the two reasons BRM listed above.

The obvious reason they allow escapes is for the heel to tease at running away and so there can still be some kind of interference....
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Big Red Machine » Jan 19th, '11, 19:40

badnewzxl wrote:
Big Red Machine wrote:While we're talking about Cage matches, I have always hated the "escape" stip, especially if the match is Escape Only. The point of the cage is to either
1) Keep the wrestlers in the ring (i.e. stop the heel from running away)
or
2) Keep others out (i.e. stop interference)

This is done to ensure a good, clean finish in which ONE MAN BEATS THE OTHER IN THE MIDDLE OF THE RING (again, the reason for the match in the first place was because someone didn't want this to happen). So why the hell would you have a stip where you can win the match by doing the EXACT THING THE STIP IS DESIGNED TO AVOID? It makes no sense.

Also, what satisfaction is there for the babyface when he wins a match by RUNNING AWAY from the heels? That's not a very babyface thing to do.
I don't think cage matches are made primarily for those two reasons, but I don't like the escape option that much either. I always thought ppl were put in cage matches bc they REALLY wanted to hurt one another, and cage matches are the"most dangerous matches in pro wrestling." I don't mind escapes all the time, but I HATE it when someone escapes through the door; that's just stupid. I think cage matches should def have locked doors and, most of the time, a top for the two reasons BRM listed above.

The obvious reason they allow escapes is for the heel to tease at running away and so there can still be some kind of interference....


Those are the reasons, historically. You can probably hurt someone a lot more in a No DQ's match than in a regular cage match (which, IMO, is part of why the HIAC cell extends around the ring, so you can use weapons [like Triple H vs. HBK]).
And there shouldn't be any interference in a cage match. That defeats the whole point of it!
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

badnewzxl
Posts: 2918
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:53

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by badnewzxl » Jan 19th, '11, 19:53

Big Red Machine wrote:
badnewzxl wrote:
Big Red Machine wrote:While we're talking about Cage matches, I have always hated the "escape" stip, especially if the match is Escape Only. The point of the cage is to either
1) Keep the wrestlers in the ring (i.e. stop the heel from running away)
or
2) Keep others out (i.e. stop interference)

This is done to ensure a good, clean finish in which ONE MAN BEATS THE OTHER IN THE MIDDLE OF THE RING (again, the reason for the match in the first place was because someone didn't want this to happen). So why the hell would you have a stip where you can win the match by doing the EXACT THING THE STIP IS DESIGNED TO AVOID? It makes no sense.

Also, what satisfaction is there for the babyface when he wins a match by RUNNING AWAY from the heels? That's not a very babyface thing to do.
I don't think cage matches are made primarily for those two reasons, but I don't like the escape option that much either. I always thought ppl were put in cage matches bc they REALLY wanted to hurt one another, and cage matches are the"most dangerous matches in pro wrestling." I don't mind escapes all the time, but I HATE it when someone escapes through the door; that's just stupid. I think cage matches should def have locked doors and, most of the time, a top for the two reasons BRM listed above.

The obvious reason they allow escapes is for the heel to tease at running away and so there can still be some kind of interference....


Those are the reasons, historically. You can probably hurt someone a lot more in a No DQ's match than in a regular cage match (which, IMO, is part of why the HIAC cell extends around the ring, so you can use weapons [like Triple H vs. HBK]).
And there shouldn't be any interference in a cage match. That defeats the whole point of it!
oh def; but I've heard more commentators refer to cage matches as the most dangerous matches than I have heard any other explained as such....
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Big Red Machine » Jan 19th, '11, 22:28

badnewzxl wrote:
Big Red Machine wrote:
badnewzxl wrote:I don't think cage matches are made primarily for those two reasons, but I don't like the escape option that much either. I always thought ppl were put in cage matches bc they REALLY wanted to hurt one another, and cage matches are the"most dangerous matches in pro wrestling." I don't mind escapes all the time, but I HATE it when someone escapes through the door; that's just stupid. I think cage matches should def have locked doors and, most of the time, a top for the two reasons BRM listed above.

The obvious reason they allow escapes is for the heel to tease at running away and so there can still be some kind of interference....


Those are the reasons, historically. You can probably hurt someone a lot more in a No DQ's match than in a regular cage match (which, IMO, is part of why the HIAC cell extends around the ring, so you can use weapons [like Triple H vs. HBK]).
And there shouldn't be any interference in a cage match. That defeats the whole point of it!
oh def; but I've heard more commentators refer to cage matches as the most dangerous matches than I have heard any other explained as such....
Becase they're trying to sell you the match. A no DQ match is far more dangerous. Also, this explanation of cage matches being "more dangerous" only cmae about AFTER the advent of the escape stip.
Look at a case like Sting-Flair. Sting didn't want to hurt Flair, and Flair didn't really want to hurt Sting. They didn't hate each other the same way that Raven and Dreamer or HBK and Triple H did. Tey just had comepting interests. Flair and the Horsemen would beat Sting (or Luger, or Dusty, or whoever) down to prevent him from winning the title because Flair wanted to keep the title. Sting wanted to win the title. They had a cage match so the Horsemen wouldn't interfere.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

badnewzxl
Posts: 2918
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:53

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by badnewzxl » Jan 20th, '11, 00:23

Big Red Machine wrote: Becase they're trying to sell you the match. A no DQ match is far more dangerous. Also, this explanation of cage matches being "more dangerous" only cmae about AFTER the advent of the escape stip.
Look at a case like Sting-Flair. Sting didn't want to hurt Flair, and Flair didn't really want to hurt Sting. They didn't hate each other the same way that Raven and Dreamer or HBK and Triple H did. Tey just had comepting interests. Flair and the Horsemen would beat Sting (or Luger, or Dusty, or whoever) down to prevent him from winning the title because Flair wanted to keep the title. Sting wanted to win the title. They had a cage match so the Horsemen wouldn't interfere.
Of course they sell you the match that way; that's what I was saying. Kayfabe it IS the most dangerous match. Legitimately, I don't think any match (other than Deathmatches of course) is more dangerous than the cage match. No DQ and No Holds Barred matches CAN be as dangerous as cag ematches, but only if an element is added. The cage match ALWAYS has a dangerous element involved; THE CAGE!

When they talk about how dangerous the cage match is, I think they're referring to the frequency at which ppl are injured (either legit or kayfabe) in the match itself bc of the damage the cage causes.
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: WOTW: Gimmick Match

Post by Big Red Machine » Jan 20th, '11, 13:41

badnewzxl wrote:
Big Red Machine wrote: Becase they're trying to sell you the match. A no DQ match is far more dangerous. Also, this explanation of cage matches being "more dangerous" only cmae about AFTER the advent of the escape stip.
Look at a case like Sting-Flair. Sting didn't want to hurt Flair, and Flair didn't really want to hurt Sting. They didn't hate each other the same way that Raven and Dreamer or HBK and Triple H did. Tey just had comepting interests. Flair and the Horsemen would beat Sting (or Luger, or Dusty, or whoever) down to prevent him from winning the title because Flair wanted to keep the title. Sting wanted to win the title. They had a cage match so the Horsemen wouldn't interfere.
Of course they sell you the match that way; that's what I was saying. Kayfabe it IS the most dangerous match. Legitimately, I don't think any match (other than Deathmatches of course) is more dangerous than the cage match. No DQ and No Holds Barred matches CAN be as dangerous as cag ematches, but only if an element is added. The cage match ALWAYS has a dangerous element involved; THE CAGE!

When they talk about how dangerous the cage match is, I think they're referring to the frequency at which ppl are injured (either legit or kayfabe) in the match itself bc of the damage the cage causes.
They say the same thing about Ladder matches, TLC, and various death-match stips. They can't ALL be the kayfabe most dangerous match type. I think that a cage was in the 80's, when blood wasn't as common, and people almost always bled in cage matches. In the 90's and on, we tend to think of things like Ladder matchas as being more dangerous.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests