Analysis of 1st 'WWE Saturday Morning Slam' Match

All WWE/F Related Reviews and Discussions
Post Reply
User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Analysis of 1st 'WWE Saturday Morning Slam' Match

Post by cero2k » Aug 27th, '12, 14:15

source: BleacherReport.com
[youtube][/youtube]
This past Saturday morning was a 180 for the company which once portrayed a character as having sexual relations with a “dead” woman.

The WWE debuted its new kids program, WWE Saturday Morning Slam, this past weekend, a show which was as kid friendly as “violence” can be.

Kofi Kingston took on Heath Slater. The match took on characteristics you would see from two very inexperienced independent wrestlers who needed to fill 10 minutes. I'm not saying the match was bad. In fact, given the circumstances and the audience, it was right on par.

The two competitors used a lot of time to pose, invoke comedy and repeatedly went back to applying armbars. Again, all of these are acceptable to use at the right times in matches, but it was noticeably different from the quality of matches most WWE superstars are capable of giving.

As I reported earlier, the WWE has a rule regarding matches on the Saturday-morning program which mandates that they not feature any moves which take aim at wrestlers' necks. This match held true to that stipulation.

Arm drags, armbars and hip tosses composed the bulk of this match.

It was simple wrestling. The match started off hot, with the babyface, Kofi Kingston, on the upper hand. Then came the heat on the heel, who cheated behind the referee's back. Finally the babyface ate his spinach, "hulked up" or any other metaphor applicable, and finished strong, getting the win.

The most basic, simple formula of match progression in wrestling executed.

The comedian in the form of Santino Marella worked his comedy in while stressing the fans give Kofi strength and that Heath Slater was a cheater.

The show featured several cutaways as the superstars made their entrances to kids in the audience reacting. Shirts containing anything deemed inappropriate were blurred.

The match was about 10 minutes of television time. The rest of the show featured positive segments such as Brodus Clay dancing and superstars answering questions.

All in all, it wasn't for me, but it wasn't suppose to be. The WWE catered to the demographic it and the advertisers were aiming to reach perfectly.

What percentage of a chance is there that a heel ever wins a match on the show?

By the way, for those who were wondering, the match featured two hip tosses, five arm drags and more than three minutes combined time in armbars or abdominal-stretch submissions.
Image

User avatar
Big Red Machine
Posts: 27378
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 15:12

Re: Analysis of 1st 'WWE Saturday Morning Slam' Match

Post by Big Red Machine » Aug 27th, '12, 14:37

I know this is a nitpick, but it should read "dead woman," not '"dead" woman,' as not only was the recipient not dead, but it was also not a woman (it was a mannequin). The way this guy has written it, it means that someone had sex with a real woman whom WWE was pretending was dead (like if someone had sex with a female version of Taker).

And as an aside, people seem to be totally not understanding what went on in that segment: WWE did not do an angle where a character went on screen and had sex with a kayfabe dead woman.

WWE did an angle where one character accused another of many years ago, off-screen, having sex with a kayfabe dead woman, then producing a clearly phony video of what was clearly himself dressed up as the other guy, getting into a casket and humping what was clearly a mannequin. At no point was there ever any necrophilia, kayfabe or not, on the screen.
Hold #712: ARM BAR!

Upcoming Reviews:
FIP in 2005
ROH Validation
PWG All-Star Weekend V: Night 2
DGUSA Open the Ultimate Gate 2013
ROH/CMLL Global Wars Espectacular: Day 3

User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Re: Analysis of 1st 'WWE Saturday Morning Slam' Match

Post by cero2k » Aug 27th, '12, 14:50

Big Red Machine wrote: At no point was there ever any necrophilia, kayfabe or not, on the screen.
it was a sketch about necrophilia
Image

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: Analysis of 1st 'WWE Saturday Morning Slam' Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Aug 27th, '12, 19:29

I was gonna post something similar to this news report after checking out the Saturday Morning Slam. Let me just say that this show is adorable, first of all. Secondly, while the match was as basic as it gets, good lord did it do its job well. Santino was the best commentator I've seen in the WWE since Jim Ross. He put over everything so clearly and well, and yeah I know that is the point because this show is for kids under 10. But hey, it works!
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

User avatar
cero2k
Site Admin
Posts: 20950
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 11:32

Re: Analysis of 1st 'WWE Saturday Morning Slam' Match

Post by cero2k » Aug 27th, '12, 19:34

yourcrapsweak wrote:I was gonna post something similar to this news report after checking out the Saturday Morning Slam. Let me just say that this show is adorable, first of all. Secondly, while the match was as basic as it gets, good lord did it do its job well. Santino was the best commentator I've seen in the WWE since Jim Ross. He put over everything so clearly and well, and yeah I know that is the point because this show is for kids under 10. But hey, it works!
the only issue i could have here is that if it's taped before a RAW or Smackdown, it may be really annoying for people outside of the demographic.
Image

User avatar
yourcrapsweak
Posts: 2001
Joined: Dec 16th, '10, 18:12

Re: Analysis of 1st 'WWE Saturday Morning Slam' Match

Post by yourcrapsweak » Aug 27th, '12, 19:36

cero2k wrote:
yourcrapsweak wrote:I was gonna post something similar to this news report after checking out the Saturday Morning Slam. Let me just say that this show is adorable, first of all. Secondly, while the match was as basic as it gets, good lord did it do its job well. Santino was the best commentator I've seen in the WWE since Jim Ross. He put over everything so clearly and well, and yeah I know that is the point because this show is for kids under 10. But hey, it works!
the only issue i could have here is that if it's taped before a RAW or Smackdown, it may be really annoying for people outside of the demographic.
Eh so what, it's a bathroom/snack break.
"I was trending worldwide on Twitter once. And then I looked in my wallet, and there was no money in there."
-Kevin Steen

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests